The prisoners whose
diet was the subject of yesterday’s post were supplied with “seconds
bread.” I was most intrigued by the
term, which comes up fairly regularly in the dietaries of prisons, lunatic
asylums and other institutions of the nineteenth century – and it seems that
some of you also wanted more information about it.
An interesting summary
of various types of flour and bread was given in an American magazine called The Monthly Journal of Agriculture , published
in 1848.
NUTRITIVE QUALITIES OF BREAD NOW IN USE.
I have had occasion
during the course of many years to pay strict attention to the processes of
bread-making, and therefore am prepared to enter upon a subject which the
existing state of the country renders of peculiar interest. The title of this
article has been adopted in order to embody the leading points of a masterly
paper that has lately appeared from the pen of Professor Johnston, of the
Edinburgh Society, than whom we do possess an analytic chemist of higher and
more trustworthy qualifications. The orders of Queen Victoria in reference to
what is styled "second bread," and the laudable zeal with which
several noblemen of high rank have adopted similar resolutions, require
particular notice, inasmuch as the term "second bread " is of
doubtful meaning, and likely to be misunderstood, especially in country
districts, where it conveys a definite unfavorable meaning.
The flour of wheat is
in England of three or four varieties. The first, by way of distinction called
"whites," is used in families for the best pastry, or by the bakers
to prepare the finest fancy and cottage loaves. The second variety is the
"household" flour used in the ordinary baker's household loaf. The
third is employed to make seconds bread, which is generally sold at 1d. per
loaf of 4 lbs. less than the prime household. There is inferiority of some
description in this second flour of the mill; but it does not consist in the
retention of the pollard, or fine portion of the skin. The country miller, and
the families who there bake their own bread upon economical principles, are
well advised as to the true meaning of these distinctions. And here, therefore
(though the terms of the North may in some slight degree differ from those employed
in our agricultural counties), I may appeal to the authority of Professor
Johnston, as I practically know that all be says on the subject is strictly
correct—thus:
"The grain of
wheat consists of two parts, with which the miller is familiar—the inner grain,
and the skin that covers it. The inner grain gives the pure wheat flour, the
skin when separated forms the bran. The miller cannot entirely peel off the
skin from his grain, and thus some of it is unavoidably ground up with his
flour. By sifting be separates it more or less completely; his seconds,
middlings, &c., owing their color to the proportion of brown bran that has
passed through the sieve along with the flour. The 'whole meal,' as it is
called, of which the so-named brown household bread is made, consists of the
entire grain ground up together, used as it comes from the mill-stones,
unsifted, and therefore containing all the bran.''
A fourth sort is used
in Berkshire, and indeed in all country districts where families purchase or
grow their own wheat and send it to the mill: it is called "farmers'
grist," or "one-way flour," and contains all the finer portions
of the pollard or middlings, after the separation of the coarse bran only; this
true wheat flour makes the best bread that can be produced—wholesome,
nutritious, of a beautiful clear yellowish white, and of surpassing flavor. It
is very economical to the family, especially if the dough be made up with water
in which the bran has been infused. But as every sack of the best white wheat,
weighing 240 lbs., yields somewhere about 40 lbs. of excellent bran, abounding
with meal, so much is abstracted from the corn, and barely 200 lbs. —say rather
196 lbs.—remain to the baker. Now we safely infer that the orders of Her
Majesty refer to the best farmers' grist, in contradistinction from the
extravagant products of the mill, called "whites " and household
flour, from which the miller's cloth has removed all the pollard. But in times
of real scarcity the entire meal claims our attention, excepting in particular
cases where coarse bran is found insalubrious to individuals.
This article indicates
an interesting technique which I have not come across before: the use of water
in which the bran has been infused to make up the dough. I cannot see how this
method serves an economical purpose as the writer suggests, although it would
presumably improve the nutritional value of an already sturdy loaf.
Recipe for the Day.
Bread made of Oatmeal and Wheat.
The following has been recommended as a good and economical bread: Add a
peck of oatmeal to the same quantity of seconds flour, and half a peck of
potatoes skinned and washed; knead it up into a dough with yeast, salt, and
warm milk; make it up into loaves, and bake. Oatmeal and reice may also be made
together into bread.
An Encyclopædia of Domestic Economy (1845)
4 comments:
I've seen several old Irish recipes similar to this, which makes sense.
And, perhaps the "economy" of using the bran water over referred not to the cost of water, but the saving of labor?
If you had to make several trip a day to the farm or village well, and carry back buckets of water, this small "savings" would be greatly appreciated.s
Interesting point, Steve. I hadnt thought of that type of economy!
So seconds bread is basically coarse high bran bread? We pay extra for that today!
Yes, interesting, isnt it, that we now pay more for "rustic" peasant food!
Post a Comment