I
want to talk today about firsts or nearly firsts, in the way of recipes. It
is impossible, of course, to give a real first,
because no recipes are completely new, but are built on previous recipes.
Sometimes the discussion is about when a dish is given a particular name, such
as in the case of the pavlova. After all, meringues were made for centuries
before someone, somewhere, someday decided to name one particular version after
a Russian ballerina.
Another
problem is that a recipe is often cooked for a long time before it is written
down, so often the best we can do is give the first known written or published recipe
– then wait until another cook or historian finds an earlier version.
I
was moved to ponder on this when I found myself reminiscing about my trip to
the UI.K last year, and the few days I had in the Peak District. It is a truly
beautiful part of England, and the home of a great specialty – the Bakewell
Pudding. This is often referred to as a Bakewell Tart, but a tart, of course,
has a pastry shell. There are several shops in the town claiming to sell the
original pudding, but this original pudding
has a pastry shell. Another item with an
almond-y filling and a cherry on top is sold at the same venues under the name
of Bakewell Tart. It also has a pastry shell.
It seems that the original version was a genuine
pudding (whatever that is), in that it does not
have a pastry shell. The first known
published recipe appears in Eliza Acton’s Modern Cookery for Private
Families, (London, 1845,) and here
it is:
Bakewell Pudding.
This
pudding is famous not only in Derbyshire, but in several of our northern
counties, where it is usually served on all holiday occasions. Line a shallow
tart-dish with quite an inchdeep layer of several kinds of good preserve mixed
together, and intermingle with them from two to three ounces of candied citron
or orange-rind. Beat well the yolks of ten eggs, and add to them gradually half
a pound of sifted sugar; when they are well mixed, pour in by degrees half a
pound of good clarified butter, and a little ratifia or any other flavour that
may be preferred; fill the dish two thirds full with this mixture, and bake the
pudding for nearly an hour in a moderate oven. Half the quantity will be
sufficient for a small dish.
Mixed preserves, 1 ½ to 2 lbs.; yolks of eggs, 10;
sugar, ½ lb.; butter, ½ lb.; ratifia, lemon-brandy, or other flavouring to the
taste: baked, moderate oven, ¾ to 1 hour.
Obs.—This
is a rich and expensive, but not a very refined pudding. A variation of it,
known in the south as an Alderman's Pudding is, we think, superior to it. It is
made without the candied peel, and with a layer of apricot-jam only, six ounces
of butter, six of sugar, the yolks of six, and the whites of two eggs.
2 comments:
I know what you mean about firsts, impossible! I wonder about the Alderman's Pudding listed below. It sounds delicious, but why is it more refined than the main recipe? I guess this calls for a taste test...
I think we have a matter of opinion - or maybe prejudice operating here! One cooks 'refined' is another's .... unrefined? inelegant? vulgar?
Post a Comment